Deacon Tazamah Ahmath fills in for Ahlazar for this pre debate special

Listen to internet radio with Debate Talk 4 U on BlogTalkRadio

Brothers review the Fruitvale Station movie which recently debuted and speak on the man who's death inspired it Oscar Grant.

The spirit of YAHAWAH BAHASHAM YAHAWASHI jumped on Chief Priest/Bishop Ahlazar BanLawya to research and expose planned parenthood and the various methods and tools of controlling and destroying the so called Black and Hispanic population here in America.

Brothers go into Job and prove he is not an edomite among other things in this lesson

The Census is directly prohibited by the bible

Chief Priest/Bishop Ahlazar BanLawya through the spirit of YAHAWAH BAHASHAM YAHAWASHI rebukes the wicked deacons of Israel United In Christ namely Deacon Aithan & Deacon Labachaa

Ahchyam take to the highways in the wake of the George Zimmerman being ruled innocent by a jury of 6 in Florida, and react to the so called white man getting away with murdering a young so called black man.

Chief Priest Ahlazar BanLawya chimes in on the star witness in the Trayvon Martin case Rachel Jeantel and her initial critical reception by the masses.

youtube.com/xodus1715

Proof those that call themselves Caucasian are in fact of the seed of Esau and not Japheth as they would like you to believe.

This week’s Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder overturned Section 4(b) of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which mandated federal oversight of changes in voting procedure in jurisdictions that have a history of using a “test or device” to impede enfranchisement. Here is one example of such a test, used in Louisiana in 1964. After the end of the Civil War, would-be black voters in the South faced an array of disproportionate barriers to enfranchisement. The literacy test—supposedly applicable to both white and black prospective voters who couldn’t prove a certain level of education but in actuality disproportionately administered to black voters—was a classic example of one of these barriers. The website of the Civil Rights Movement Veterans, which collects materials related to civil rights, hosts a few samples of actual literacy tests used in Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi during the 1950s and 1960s. In many cases, people working within the movement collected these in order to use them in voter education, which is how we ended up with this documentary evidence. Update: This test—a word-processed transcript of an original—was linked to by Jeff Schwartz, who worked with the Congress of Racial Equality in Iberville and Tangipahoa Parishes in the summer of 1964. Schwartz wrote about his encounters with the test in this blog post. Most of the tests collected here are a battery of trivia questions related to civic procedure and citizenship. (Two from the Alabama test: “Name the attorney general of the United States” and “Can you be imprisoned, under Alabama law, for a debt?”) But this Louisiana “literacy” test, singular among its fellows, has nothing to do with citizenship. Designed to put the applicant through mental contortions, the test's questions are often confusingly worded. If some of them seem unanswerable, that effect was intentional. The (white) registrar would be the ultimate judge of whether an answer was correct. Try this one: “Write every other word in this first line and print every third word in same line (original type smaller and first line ended at comma) but capitalize the fifth word that you write.”

 

Louisiana Voter Literacy Test, circa 1964. Via the Civil Right Movement Veterans website. 

Louisiana Voter Literacy Test, circa 1964. Via the Civil Rights Movement Veterans website. 

Louisiana Voter Literacy Test, circa 1964. 

By Gudrun Schultz EDINBURGH, Scotland, February 16, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Nurses and other health care professionals should avoid using the terms ‘mom’ and ‘dad’ to refer to family relationships since the terms could be offensive to homosexual couples with children, a new directive published by Scotland’s National Health Service recommends. Issued in conjunction with the country’s leading homosexual activist organization Stonewall Scotland, the publication is entitled Fair For All - The Wider Challenge: Good LGBT Practice in the NHS. Americans for Truth reported Feb.11 on the publication’s release. The booklet calls for a “zero-tolerance policy to discriminatory language” among Scotland’s health care system. Included in discriminatory language is the use of terms that assume a traditional family structure of mother, father and children, according to the NHS directive. “LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered] people can and do have children, sexual orientation or gender identity has nothing to do with good parenting or good child care,” the booklet states. “Individual circumstances lead to varied family structures and parenting arrangements. It is important to be aware of this. When talking to children, consider using ‘parents’, ‘carers’ or ‘guardians’ rather than ‘mother’ or ‘father’. Along the same lines, the directive points out, use of the terms ‘husband’, ‘wife’ and ‘marriage’ is not acceptable since such terms exclude lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Instead, health care workers should use the terms ‘partners’ and ‘next of kin’. Since ‘next of kin’ is often understood to mean nearest blood relative, however, the booklet recommends that it may be preferable to use ‘partner, close friend or close relative’ to avoid confusion. “This allows the patient to identify and choose who is important to them.” Other recommendations include ensuring the health care environment is visually reassuring to LGBT people, with posters and magazines on LGBT issues on display. “Posters with positive images of same-sex couples, alongside similar material depicting opposite-sex couples, should be displayed in all areas e.g. waiting areas, hospital wards.” In order to better ensure the comfort and security of LGBT people in the health care environment, the NHS calls for sexual identity “monitoring forms” to be included in all registration procedures for both staff and patients. The booklet recommends five reply options to the question of sexual orientation, including ‘Lesbian’, ‘Gay’, ‘Bisexual’, ‘Heterosexual’, and ‘Other’. Sections recording gender should be changed to have three reply options, ‘Male’, ‘Female’, or ‘Other, “where people can define their own gender.” Among guidelines for implementing pro-LGBT policies in the health care system, the directive requires that management or team leader job descriptions include a mandatory commitment to combating any “discriminatory” language or attitudes among staff. The booklet was funded by taxpayers through the NHS Education for Scotland, as part of the Equality and Diversity program. VIA http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive//ldn/2007/feb/07021603